I think at this point, we can all agree that Mitt Romney is going to be the Republican nominee. Regardless of what Newt Gingrich might think, assuming that he does think at all, or the fondest hopes of the Paultards for a brokered convention (Please. I could use the entertainment.), he's going to be the guy who gets to lose to President Obama on the first Tuesday of November (Cthulhu willing).
The problem with Willard "Mittens" Romney is that in a time when the economy could, at best, be described as "meh" for most people, he is rich. And not only is he rich, but he's like a caricature of a millionaire. He talks about how he doesn't follow NASCAR a lot, but he has
friends who own NASCAR teams. His wife owns
two Cadillacs, and his renovated house in California will apparently have a garage large enough that he'll need
an elevator to move his cars around. He tried to pander to Wisconsonites by joking about the time his Pappy
moved a factory from Michigan to Wisconsin. When he went to college, he paid for his apartment by
selling stock Pappy gave him for his birthday. I think what we've got here is a
failure to communicate.
And you might say, "Dude, you're being unreasonable when you expect a millionaire born to a wealthy family to connect with ordinary people." The problem with that line of argument is that the 43rd President was a millionaire born to a wealthy family, and he spent eight years in the Oval Office. Not only that, but both Dubya and Mittens were born to politically connected families. The difference between them is that Mittens can legitimately claim to be a businessman of enough skill to have made some money, even if
it came at the cost of American jobs. Before Bush became Governor of Texas, he basically
failed into one company after another.
But one of them was someone a lot of Americans could relate to enough that they could picture sitting down with him and
having a beer with him, while the other is stiff and awkward
around potential voters, and
doesn't know how to pander. Say what you will about Dubya, he at least seemed like a reasonable facsimile of a regular American. His policies may have been disastrous, and he may have left office with Nixonian approval ratings, but he had a modicum of personal charm.
I think the difference can be expressed in fictional terms by comparing both of them to notable TV androids. In this analogy, Bush is one of the
skinjobs from the rebooted
Battlestar Galactica. He looks and acts human, and only when you dig beneath that exterior do you find the heart of a robot bent on exterminating humanity.
Mittens, on the other hand, is
Data, from
Star Trek: The Next Generation. He's obviously not entirely human, even though he tries to act like a human, and it doesn't take a keen observer to detect this. He's making a valiant effort to seem human, but it doesn't come naturally to him, and it's pretty obvious.
I'm sure he's desperately hoping that doesn't turn out to be a problem in November.
